Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Articles

No. 1(6) (2014): The Politics of Truth

Could a Consultant Be a Constructionist?

  • Barbara Czarniawska
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51196/srz.6.9
Submitted
June 12, 2020
Published
2014-04-01

Abstract

This article explores difficulties of employing a constructionist stance when confronted with the institutionalized expectations of managers. The difficulty is grounded in a contrast between the logic of representation, conventionally used in contacts between researchers and managers, and the logic of practice, which is the medium of everyday organizational life and the focus of constructionist interest. The final discussion raises the question of whether the two kinds of logic can be reconciled with the logic of theory and the contract between managerial practice and managerial theory rewritten along new lines.

References

  1. Argyris C., Schön D.A. 1978. Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective, MA: Addison-Wesley, Reading.
  2. Berger P., Luckmann T. 2010. Społeczne tworzenie rzeczywistości, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
  3. Bourdieu P. 2008. Zmysł praktyczny, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków.
  4. Brunsson N. 1989. The organization of hypocrisy: Talk, decision and actions in organizations. Wiley, Chichester.
  5. Czarniawska B. 2002. A tale of three cities, or the glocalization of city management, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  6. Czarniawska B. 2003. Social constructionism and organization studies, [w:] Debating organization. Point-counterpoint in organization studies, red. R. Westwood, S. Clegg, Blackwell Publishing, Melbourne, s. 128–139.
  7. Czarniawska B. 2012. Nowe techniki badań terenowych: shadowing, [w:] Badania jakościowe: Metody i narzędzia, red. D. Jemielniak, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa, s. 69–90.
  8. Czarniawska B. 2014. Zmiana kadru: Jak zarządzano Warszawą w okresie przemian, Sedno, Warszawa.
  9. Czarniawska B., Mazza C. 2003. Consulting as liminal space, „Human Relations” 2003, 56(3), s. 267–290.
  10. Eco U. 1990. The limits of interpretation, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
  11. Feyerabend P. 1988. Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge, Verso, London.
  12. Flyvbjerg B., Landman T., Schram S. red. 2012. Real social science: Applied phronesis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  13. Geertz C. 1995. After the fact: Two countries, four decades, one anthropologist, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  14. Gergen K. 1994. Realities and relationships. Soundings in social construction. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  15. Gergen K. 2009. An invitation to social construction. Sage, London.
  16. Holzner B. 1968. Reality construction in society, Schenkman, Cambridge, MA.
  17. Knorr Cetina K. 1981. The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
  18. Knorr Cetina K. 1993. Strong constructivism – from a sociologist’s point of view, „Social Studies of Science” 1993, 23, s. 555–563.
  19. Knorr Cetina K. 1994. Primitive classification and postmodernity: Towards a sociological notion of fiction, „Theory, Culture and Society” 1994, 112, s. 1–22.
  20. Latour B. 1986. The powers of association, [w:] Power, action and belief, red. J. Law, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, s. 261–277.
  21. Latour B. 2010. Splatając na nowo, co społeczne. Universitas, Kraków.
  22. Latour B., Woolgar S. 1979. Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts, Sage, Beverly Hills.
  23. March J.G., Olsen J. 1989. Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. Free Press, New York
  24. Marcus G.E. 1992. Past, present and emergent identities: Requirements for ethnographies of the late twentieth century modernity world-wide, [w:] Modernity and identity. red. J. Friedman, S. Lash, Blackwell, Oxford, s. 309–330.
  25. McNamee S., Gergen K.J. red. 1992. Relational responsibility, Sage, London.
  26. Nussbaum M.C. 1994. The therapy of desire. Theory and practice in hellenistic ethics, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  27. Nussbaum M.C. 1997. Cultivating humanity. A classical defense of reform in liberal education, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  28. Ossowska M., Ossowski S. 1935. Nauka o nauce, „Nauka Polska” 1935, 20.
  29. Power M. 1997. The audit society. Rituals of verification, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  30. Rorty R. 1980. Philosophy and the mirror of nature, Blackwell, Oxford.
  31. Shulman B. 1996. What if we change our axioms? A feminist inquiry into the foundations of mathematics, „Configurations” 1996, 3, s. 427–451.
  32. Silverman D. 1972. Methodology and meaning, [w:] New directions in sociological theory, red. P. Filmer et al., Collier-Macmillan, London, s. 183–200.
  33. Sismondo S. 1993. Some social constructions, „Social Studies of Science” 1993, 233, s. 515–553.
  34. Tyler S. 1986. Postmodern ethnography: From document of the occult to occult document, [w:] Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography, red. J. Clifford, G. Marcus, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, s. 122–140.
  35. Van Maanen J. 1988. Tales of the field, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.