Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

No. 2(5) (2013): Post-Secularisms

Reflexive Orthodoxy. The Problem of Postsecularism in the Light of Social Systems Theory

  • Krzysztof C. Matuszek
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51196/srz.5.15
Submitted
June 11, 2020
Published
2013-11-01

Abstract

Does religious orthodoxy and reflexivity exclude each other? In this article I discuss the question of a postsecular reflexivity of belief. The key issue in this context appears to be the functioning of belief as a symbolically generalized communication medium. With respect to this I consider some theoretical problems and dilemmas of religiosity: orthodoxy vs. heterodoxy, coherent personal identity vs. complementary social role. The article starts with a definition of postsecularism, based on the reflections of Habermas, Berger and Casanova, as a change in social consciousness consisting in a conversion of attitudes towards religion from naïve to reflexive. Then I present main arguments of the secularization theory on the grounds of Luhmann’s social systems theory, distinguishing two interconnected levels: functional differentiation of modern society and individualism. Finally I make some remarks on Luhmann’s attitude towards religion.

References

  1. Benedykt XVI. 2006. Glaube, Vernunft und Universität. Erinnerungen und Reflexionen. http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/speeches/2006/september/documents; dostęp: 21.02.2013.
  2. Benedykt XVI. 2012. Serce rozumne. Refleksje na temat podstaw prawa, „Horyzonty Polityki” 2012, nr 3(4), s. 13–20.
  3. Berger P.L. 1999. The Desecularization of the World: A Global Overview, [w:] The Desecularization of the World. Resurgent Religion and World Politics, red. P.L. Berger, Ethics and Public Policy Centre, Washington, D.C., s. 1–18.
  4. Berger P.L. 2005. Święty baldachim. Elementy socjologicznej teorii religii, NOMOS, Kraków.
  5. Casanova J. 1984. The Politics of the Religious Revival, „Telos” 1984, nr 59, s. 3–33.
  6. Casanova J. 2005. Religie publiczne w nowoczesnym świecie, NOMOS, Kraków.
  7. Davie G. 1994. Religion in Britain since 1945: Believing without Belonging, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  8. Davie G. 1999. Europe: The Exception That Proves the Rule?, [w:] The Desecularization of the World. Resurgent Religion and World Politics, red. P.L. Berger, Ethics and Public Policy Centre, Washington, D.C., s. 65–84.
  9. Habermas J., Luhmann N. red. 1971, Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.
  10. Habermas J. 2000. Filozoficzny dyskurs nowoczesności, Universitas, Kraków.
  11. Habermas J. 2002. Glauben und Wissen. „Dialog” 2002, nr 1, s. 63–74.
  12. Habermas J. 2008. Notes on a Post-Secular Society. http://print.signandsight.com/features/ 1714.html; dostęp: 17.01.2013.
  13. Ingelhart R., Pippa N. 2006. Sacrum i profanum. Religia i polityka na świecie, NOMOS, Kraków.
  14. Jan Paweł II. 1981. Laborem exercens, Watykan.
  15. Jan Paweł II. 1987. Sollicitudo rei socialis, Watykan.
  16. Kepel G. 1991. La Revanche de Dieu. Chrétiens, juifs et musulmans à la reconquête du monde, Seuil, Paris.
  17. Kurowski M. 2011. Socjologiczne opętanie, „Stan Rzeczy” 2011, nr 1(1), s. 48–63.
  18. Luckmann T. 1996. Niewidzialna religia, NOMOS, Kraków.
  19. Luhmann N. 1977. Funktion der Religion, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.
  20. Luhmann N. 1984. Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.
  21. Luhmann N. 1997. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.
  22. Luhmann N. 2000. Die Religion der Gesellschaft, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.
  23. Luhmann N. 2000b. Das Medium der Religion. Eine soziologische Betrachtung űber Gott und die Seelen, „Soziale Systeme“ 2000, nr 6, s. 39–51.
  24. Luhmann N. 2008. Soziologische Aufklärung 6. Die Soziologie und der Mensch, VS Verlag, Wiesbaden.
  25. Mariański J. 2011. Katolicyzm polski – ciągłość i zmiana. Studium socjologiczne, WAM, Kraków.
  26. Olearnik P. 2012. Poland: a Case-Study in Secularization, „Horyzonty Polityki” 2012, nr 3(5), s. 103–130.
  27. Taylor Ch. 2007. A Secular Age, Harvard University Press, Harvard.
  28. Weigel G. 1999. Roman Catholicism in the Age of John Paul II, [w:] The Desecularization of the World. Resurgent Religion and World Politics, red. P.L. Berger, Ethics and Public Policy Centre, Washington, D.C., s. 19–36.
  29. Weigel G. 2013. Evangelical Catholicism: Deep Reform in the 21st Century Church, Basic Books, New York."

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.