logo

Artykuły

Nr 2(27) (2024): Duch kapitalizmu

The Digital Hindu Spirit of Capitalism: The Justification Strategies of Sadhguru and Sri Sri Ravi Shankar

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51196/srz.27.9
Przesłane
23 December 2025
Opublikowane
23-12-2025

Abstrakt

This paper introduces and investigates the concept of the Digital Hindu Spirit of Capitalism (DHSC). It explores the nexus where contemporary spirituality, rooted in diverse Hindu traditions, intersects with global capitalism and digital technologies. Focusing on two influential global figures, Sadhguru (the Isha Foundation) and Sri Sri Ravi Shankar (the Art of Living), this article examines how they navigate and legitimise their digital mediation, political alignment, and large-scale, commercially engaged spiritual enterprises. Building on Weber’s and Boltanski and Chiapello’s work on the spirit of capitalism, and Huberman’s analysis of digital capitalism, DHSC denotes the specific constellation of values and justifications arising when digital platform logics intersect with adapted Hindu concepts (e.g., seva, guru authority, spiritual technologies). Applying qualitative thematic analysis to Sadhguru’s and Shankar’s primary websites, selected video content, and newspaper articles, the paper addresses two questions: (1) What capitalistic practices are embedded in the digital presence and organisations of these individuals? (2) How, when analysed through Boltanski & Thévenot’s Orders of Worth framework, do they appear to mobilise justificatory strategies to legitimise these practices and manage inherent tensions? The findings reveal shared DHSC characteristics, including adaptive justifications, hybrid discourses, techno-solutionist framings, and reliance on digital platforms (Techno-Seva). However, a comparative analysis highlights distinct foundational logics, which are particularly visible during challenges (épreuves): Sri Sri Ravi Shankar predominantly relies on Projective worth (network capacity, scale), while Sadhguru employs a tightly integrated blend of Market, Industrial, Projective, Inspired, and Fame logics, and often frames commercial aspects as intrinsic to the mission. By delineating these strategies, the study contributes to understanding the operational features and legitimating mechanisms of the DHSC, offering insights into contemporary Digital Hinduism and the relationship between religion, the media, and capitalism.

Bibliografia

  1. Abidin C. 2016. “Visibility Labour: Engaging with Influencers’ Fashion Brands and #OOTD Advertorial Campaigns on Instagram,” Media International Australia, vol. 161(1), pp. 86–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X16665177
  2. Arli D. 2017. “Does Ethics Need Religion? Evaluating the Importance of Religiosity in Consumer Ethics,” Marketing Intelligence & Planning, vol. 35(2), pp. 205–221, https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-06-2016-0096. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-06-2016-0096
  3. Arli D., Gupta N., Sardana D., Sharma P. 2023. “Demystifying the Evaluation of Brands Endorsed by Religious Leaders in the Emerging Markets,” International Marketing Review, vol. 40(1), pp. 155–175, https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-01-2022-0008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-08-2021-0258
  4. Athique A., Parthasarathi V., eds. 2020. Platform Capitalism in India, Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44563-8
  5. Balog A., Baker L., Walker A. 2014. “Religiosity and Spirituality in Entrepreneurship: A Review and Research Agenda,” Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, vol. 11(2), pp. 107–129, https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2013.836127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2013.836127
  6. Beckerlegge G. 2000. “Swami Akhandananda’s Sevavrata (Vow of Service) and the Earliest Expressions of Service to Humanity in the Ramakrishna Math and Mission,” [in:] Gurus and Their Followers, ed. A. Copley, Oxford University Press, pp. 59–82.
  7. Bingaman K.A. 2023. “Religion in the Digital Age: An Irreversible Process,” Religions, vol. 14(1), 108, https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14010108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14010108
  8. Boltanski L., Chiapello E. 2005. “The New Spirit of Capitalism,” International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, vol. 18, pp. 161–188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-006-9006-9
  9. Boltanski L., Thévenot L. 2006. On Justification: Economies of Worth, Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400827145
  10. Boyatzis R.E. 1998. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development, Sage Publications.
  11. Braun V., Clarke V. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3(2), pp. 77–101, https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  12. Braun V., Clarke V. 2019. “Reflecting on Reflexive Thematic Analysis,” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, vol. 11(4), pp. 589-597, https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
  13. Campbell H.A. 2012. Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in Digital Media, Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203084861
  14. Cheong P.H. 2016. “Religious Authority and Social Media Branding in a Culture of Religious Celebrification,” [in:] The Media and Religious Authority, ed. S. Hoover, Penn State University Press, pp. 63–80, https://doi.org/10.5325/j.ctv14gp1zt.8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5325/j.ctv14gp1zt.8
  15. Cheong P.H., Huang S., Poon J.P.H. 2011. “Religious Communication and Epistemic Authority of Leaders in Wired Faith Organizations,” Journal of Communication, vol. 61(5), pp. 938–958, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01579.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01579.x
  16. Copeman J., Longkumer A., Duggal K. 2023a. “Gurus and Media: An Introduction,” [in:] Gurus and Media: Sound, Image, Machine, Text and the Digital, eds. J. Copeman, A. Longkumer, K. Duggal, UCL Press, pp. 1–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.16430729.6
  17. Copeman J., Longkumer A., Duggal K., eds. 2023b. Gurus and Media: Sound, Image, Machine, Text and the Digital, UCL Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.16430729
  18. De Michelis E. 2004. A History of Modern Yoga: Patañjali and Western Esotericism, Continuum.
  19. DeNapoli A.E. 2017. “Dharm Is Technology: The Theologizing of Technology in the Experimental Hinduism of Renouncers in Contemporary North India,” International Journal of Dharma Studies, vol. 5, 18, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40613-017-0053-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40613-017-0053-0
  20. Dobe T. 2015. Hindu Christian Faqir: Modern Monks, Global Christianity, and Indian Sainthood, Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199987696.001.0001
  21. Dobe T.S. 2016. “Modern Monks and Global Hinduism,” [in:] Hinduism in the Modern World, ed. B.A. Hatcher, Routledge, pp. 161–179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203362037-22
  22. Duffy B.E., Pinch A., Sawey M. 2021. “The Nested Precarities of Creative Labor on Social Media,” Social Media + Society, vol. 7(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211021368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211021368
  23. ET Bureau. 2014. “I Never Said I Support BJP: Sri Sri Ravi Shankar,” The Economic Times, 10.04.2014, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/i-never-said-i-support-bjp-sri-sri-ravi-shankar/articleshow/33531872.cms, accessed: 2.12.2025.
  24. FE News Desk. 2019. “Ayodhya Ram Mandir Case Mediation: Know All about Justice FM Kalifulla, Sri Sri Ravi Shankar and Sriram Panchu,”Financial Express, 8.03.2019, https://www.financialexpress.com/india-news/ayodhya-ram-mandir-case-mediation-supreme-court-justice-fm-kalifulla-srisri-ravi-shankar-sriram-panchu-all-you-need-to-know/1509169/, accessed: 2.12.2025.
  25. Flood G. 2004. The Ascetic Self: Subjectivity, Memory and Tradition, Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617522
  26. Flood G. 2014. “Foreword,” [in:] The Bloomsbury Companion to Hindu Studies, ed. J. Frazier, Bloomsbury, xi–xii.
  27. Frazier J., ed. 2014. The Bloomsbury Companion to Hindu Studies, Bloomsbury. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472552655
  28. Gillespie T. 2010. “The Politics of ‘Platforms,’” New Media & Society, vol. 12(3), pp. 347–364, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738
  29. Goodall D., Isaacson H. 2011. “Tantric Traditions,” [in:] The Continuum Companion to Hindu Studies, eds. J. Frazier, G. Flood, Continuum International Publishing Group, pp. 122–137.
  30. Habermas J. 1970. Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, MIT Press.
  31. Halbfass W. 1988. “Philosophy in Modern Hinduism,” [in:] India and Europe: An Essay in Understanding, State University of New York Press, pp. 287–309.
  32. Hansen T.B. 1999. The Saffron Wave: Democracy and Hindu Nationalism in Modern India, Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400823055
  33. Hatcher B.A., ed. 2016. Hinduism in the Modern World, Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203362037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203362037
  34. Hausner S.L. 2007. Wandering with Sadhus: Ascetics in the Hindu Himalayas, Indiana University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/4206.0
  35. Heelas P., Woodhead L. 2005. The Spiritual Revolution: Why Religion Is Giving Way to Spirituality, Blackwell.
  36. Hjarvard S. 2011. “The Mediatisation of Religion: Theorising Religion, Media and Social Change,” Culture and Religion, vol. 12(2), pp. 119-135, https://doi.org/10.1080/14755610.2011.579719. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14755610.2011.579719
  37. Huberman J. 2022. The Spirit of Digital Capitalism, Polity Press.
  38. Isha Foundation. 2017. “Sadhguru Receiving the Padma Vibhushan Award,” 13.04.2017, https://isha.sadhguru.org/en/wisdom/video/sadhguru-receiving-padma-vibhushan, accessed: 2.12.2025.
  39. Isha Foundation. 2019. “Sadhguru, Are You Right-Wing?,” https://isha.sadhguru.org/en/wisdom/video/sadhguru-right-wing, accessed: 2.12.2025.
  40. Jacobs S. 2015. The Art of Living Foundation: Spirituality and Wellbeing in the Global Context, Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315612621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315612621
  41. Jacobsen K.A., ed. 2011. Yoga Powers: Extraordinary Capacities Attained through Meditation and Concentration, Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004212145.i-520
  42. Jacobsen K.A. 2014. “Sāmkhya-Yoga Traditions,” [in:] The Bloomsbury Companion to Hindu Studies, ed. J. Frazier, Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 95–110.
  43. Jaffrelot C. 2017. “India’s Democracy at 70: Toward a Hindu State?” Journal of Democracy vol. 28(3), pp. 52–63, https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2017.0044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2017.0044
  44. Jaffrelot C. 2021. Modi’s India: Hindu Nationalism and the Rise of Ethnic Democracy, Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691223094
  45. Kanungo P. 2019. “Gurus and the Hindu Nationalist Politics: The Baba Ramdev–BJP Partnership in the 2014 Elections,” [in:] The Algebra of Warfare-Welfare: A Long View of India’s 2014 Election, eds. I. Ahmad, P. Kanungo, Oxford University Press, pp. 119–142, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199489626.003.0004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199489626.003.0004
  46. Khandelwal M. 2016. “Renunciation and Domesticity,” [in:] Hinduism in the Modern World, ed. B.A. Hatcher, Routledge, pp. 196–211.
  47. Kim H.H. 2016. “Thinking through Akshardham and the Making of the Swaminarayan Self,” [in:] Swaminarayan Hinduism: Tradition, Adaptation, and Identity, eds. R.B. Williams, Y. Trivedi, Oxford University Press, pp. 383–401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199463749.003.0023
  48. Kumar S. 2020. “Sadhguru: BJP’s Spiritual Henchman,” The Express Tribune, 2.04.2020, https://tribune.com.pk/article/93511/sadhguru-bjps-spiritual-henchman, accessed: 2.12.2025.
  49. Larkin B. 2013. “The Politics and Poetics of Infrastructure,” [in:] Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 42, pp. 327–343, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155522
  50. Lawrence D.P. 2011. “Hindu Philosophical Traditions,” [in:] The Continuum Companion to Hindu Studies, ed. J. Frazier, Continuum, pp. 137–151.
  51. Lövheim M. 2011. “Mediatisation of Religion: A Critical Appraisal,” Culture and Religion, vol. 12(2), pp. 153–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14755610.2011.579738
  52. Lucia A. 2014. “Innovative Gurus: Tradition and Change in Contemporary Hinduism,” International Journal of Hindu Studies, vol. 18(2), pp. 221–263, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11407-014-9159-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11407-014-9159-5
  53. Lundby K., Christensen H.R., Gresaker A.K., Lövheim M., Niemelä K., Sjö S., Daníelsson Á.S. 2018. “Religion and the Media: Continuity, Complexity, and Mediatization,” [in:] Religious Complexity in the Public Sphere: Comparing Nordic Countries, eds. H.R. Christensen, K. Stjerna, N.K. Squires, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 193–249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55678-9_5
  54. Malinar A. 2011. “Hindu Cosmologies,” [in:] The Continuum Companion to Hindu Studies, ed. J. Frazier, Continuum, pp. 60–74.
  55. Mannila H., Zeiler X. 2019. “Mediatized Gurus: Hindu Religious and Artistic Authority and Digital Culture,” [in:] Digital Hinduism, ed. X. Zeiler, Routledge, pp. 145–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315107523-9
  56. Nachtwey O., Seidl T. 2023. “The Solutionist Ethic and the Spirit of Digital Capitalism,” Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 41(2), pp. 91–112, https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764231196829. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764231196829
  57. Pandya S.P. 2015. “New Strategies of New Religious Movements: The Case of Art of Living Foundation,” Sociological Bulletin, vol. 64(3), pp. 287–304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022920150301
  58. Pathak A. 2025. “The Guru and the Politician: The Broken Spirit behind the Spiritualism Industry,” The Indian Express, 10.01.2025, https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/the-guru-and-the-politician-thebroken-spirit-behind-the-spiritualism-industry-9766857/, accessed: 2.12.2025.
  59. Pennington B.K. 2016. “Hinduism in North India,” [in:] Hinduism in the Modern World, ed. B.A. Hatcher, Routledge, pp. 31–47.
  60. Prasad L. 2016. “Hinduism in South India,” [in:] Hinduism in the Modern World, ed. B.A. Hatcher, Routledge, pp. 15–30.
  61. PTI. 2025. “SC Pulls Up TNPCB for Filing Plea after Two Years against Order Quashing Notice to Isha Foundation,” The Hindu, 14.02.2025, https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/scpulls-up-tnpcb-for-filing-plea-after-two-years-against-order-quashingnotice-to-isha-foundation/article69218592.ece, accessed: 2.12.2025.
  62. Rubin P.H. 2016. “Crony Capitalism,” Supreme Court Economic Review, vol. 23(1), pp. 105–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/686474
  63. Sardesai R. 2016. “Art of Living and Politicians: When Loyalty Trumps Propriety,” Hindustan Times, 17.03.2016, https://www.hindustantimes.com/columns/art-of-living-and-politicians-when-loyalty-trumps-propriety/story-61YMQoub6EGFVWdiz8ffrJ.html, accessed: 2.12.2025.
  64. Sen A.P. 2016. “Debates within Colonial Hinduism,” [in:] Hinduism in the Modern World, ed. B.A. Hatcher, Routledge, pp. 67–79.
  65. Senft T.M. 2013. “Microcelebrity and the Branded Self,” [in:] A Companion to New Media Dynamics, eds. J. Hartley, J. Burgess, A. Bruns, Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 346-354, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118321607.ch22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118321607.ch22
  66. Sinha V. 2019. “The Internet: A New Marketplace for Transacting Pūjā Items,” [in:] Digital Hinduism, ed. X. Zeiler, Routledge, pp. 163–185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315107523-10
  67. Srnicek N. 2017. Platform Capitalism, Polity Press.
  68. Stietencron H. von. 1997. Hindu Religious Traditions and the Concept of Religion, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
  69. Taylor C. 2007. A Secular Age, Harvard University Press, https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674044289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674044289
  70. Tøllefsen I. 2011. “Art of Living: Religious Entrepreneurship and Legitimation Strategies,” International Journal for the Study of New Religions, vol. 2(2), pp. 255–279. https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsnr.v2i2.255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsnr.v2i2.255
  71. van Dijck J., Poell T., de Waal, M. 2018. The Platform Society, Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001
  72. Warrier M. 2005. Hindu Selves in a Modern World: Guru Faith in the Mata Amritanandamayi, Routledge Curzon. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203462065
  73. Weber M. 1930 (1904–1905). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, trans. T. Parsons, George Allen & Unwin.
  74. Weber M., Henderson A.M., Parsons T. 1947. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, Oxford University Press.
  75. Williamson L. 2016. “Modern Yoga and Tantra,” [in:] Hinduism in the Modern World, ed. B.A. Hatcher, Routledge, pp. 180–195.
  76. Zeiler X. 2018. “Mediatized Religion in Asia: Interrelations of Media, Culture and Society beyond the ‘West,’” [in:] Mediatized Religion in Asia, eds. K. Radde-Antweiler, X. Zeiler, Routledge, pp. 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315170275-2
  77. Zeiler X., ed. 2021. Digital Hinduism, Routledge.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Podobne artykuły

51-60 z 79

Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.